Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12475.1318691636@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Call stacks and RAISE INFO
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2011/10/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have no problem with this. A context can be false for info and true
>>> for other in default. Please, use a different identifier than
>>> "context", that can be use for reading context in future - maybe
>>> "attach_context" or some similar.
>> error_context?
> what about show_context, hide_context, hold_context, use_context ??
I still think it should be CONTEXT, period. All the other options to
RAISE are named directly after the message lines they control; why
should this one be different?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: