Re: Advertising standards WAS: Vote on Windows ...
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Advertising standards WAS: Vote on Windows ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1247474567.11347.889.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Advertising standards WAS: Vote on Windows ... (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Advertising standards WAS: Vote on Windows ...
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 11:20 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Rob Napier is correct in pointing out that we don't have clear standards > for this. They'd be very hard to write due to the need to balance value > provided because of the above. Again, why is it very hard to write standards that concern installers, yet 2 weeks ago you yourself proposed (on the www list) that we write a new policy for training companies? Both Dave and yourself are clearly arguing there for policies and controls. Let's have a policy (or group or other mechanism) that includes *everybody* and lets's ensure that people closely associated with the companies involved are not the ones making the decisions that their companies benefit from. (Would you expect CertFirst to be the moderator of the new training policy?) Perhaps there *is* a need to "balance value", perhaps not. If there is, it cannot be left up to the people providing things to decide the value of them. We cannot ignore the significant majority of people that have voted that they want to see an alternative to the current links. There are many people watching and waiting for some action, not reasons why nothing can be done. (I personally would not stand for election to any policy group.) -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: