Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1246906.1739896202@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > That is a +1 for the specific design of "check SELECT on the index's > table". I don't want to be closed-minded: if you have some strong > reason for believing that's the wrong thing to do, I'm all ears. > However, I'm presently of the view that it is exactly the right thing > to do, to the point where I don't currently understand why there's > anything to think about here. I have no objection to it, but I wasn't as entirely convinced as you are that it's the only plausible answer. One specific thing I'm slightly worried about is that a naive implementation would probably cause this function to lock the table after the index, risking deadlock against queries that take the locks in the more conventional order. I don't recall what if anything we've done about that in other places (-ENOCAFFEINE). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: