Re: Query progress indication - an implementation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query progress indication - an implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1246348121.27964.26.camel@dn-x300-willij обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query progress indication - an implementation (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:04 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Le 30 juin 2009 à 01:34, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> a écrit : > > Basically I disagree that imperfect progress reports annoy users. I > > think we can do better than reporting 250% done or having a percentage > > that goes backward though. It would be quite tolerable (though perhaps > > for no logical reason) to have a progress indicator which slows done > > as it gets closer to 100% and never seems to make it to 100%. > > I guess bad stats are such an important problem in planning queries > that a 250% progress is doing more good than harm in showing users how > badly they need to review their analyze related settings. Yeh, I agree. We can define it as "planned work", rather than actual. So if the progress bar says 250% and query is still going at least you know it is doing more work, rather than just being slow at doing the planned work. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: