Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?
Дата
Msg-id 1245908719.19608.4.camel@tillium.localnet
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?  (Chris St Denis <lists@on-track.ca>)
Ответы Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 21:03 -0700, Chris St Denis wrote:
> This sounds like something that should just be on by default, not a
> trigger. Is there some reason it would waste the io of writing a new row
> to disk if nothing has changed? or is it just considered too much
> unnecessary overhead to compare them?

I think the theory is that carefully written applications generally do
not generate redundant updates in the first place. An application that
avoids redundant updates should not have to pay the cost of redundant
update detection and elimination.

--
Craig Ringer


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris St Denis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tsvector_update_trigger performance?