Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1243621409.31613.61.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 18:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > What's your point? Surely the applied patch is a *necessary* component > of any attempt to try to ensure archiving is complete at shutdown. > I agree that it doesn't cover every risk factor, and there are some > risk factors that cannot be covered by Postgres itself. But isn't it > a step in a desirable direction? Well, in one way, yes. I certainly encourage Guillaume to submit more patches and for everybody to review them, as has been done. I turned up late to the party on this, I know. Regrettably, the patch doesn't remove the problem it was supposed to remove and I'm highlighting there is still risk of data loss. I suggest that we don't change any docs, and carefully word or even avoid any release note inclusion to avoid lulling people into stopping safety measures. The patch doesn't cause any problems though so we don't need to remove it either. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: