Re: survey of WAL blocksize changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: survey of WAL blocksize changes
Дата
Msg-id 1243414009.24860.134.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на survey of WAL blocksize changes  (Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: survey of WAL blocksize changes  (Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 19:51 -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> It appears for this workload using a 16KB or 32KB gets more than 4%
> throughput improvement, but some of that could be noise. 

The baseline appears to have a significant jump in txn response time
after 77 mins on the baseline test. I think you should rerun that. My
guess would be it will reduce any gains shown with higher settings.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: search_path vs extensions