Re: Seq scan vs index scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Seq scan vs index scan
Дата
Msg-id 1242761.1711167196@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Seq scan vs index scan  (arun chirappurath <arunsnmimt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
arun chirappurath <arunsnmimt@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a table named  users with index on user name.
> ...
> When I try to do below select query it's taking seq scan and query returns
> in 5ms.

5ms is an okay runtime, I would think.  Is the table empty?

> I am trying to force query to use indexes  using query hints.

The way to force it would be enable_seqscan = off.  I would not
be surprised to hear that that makes it slower, though.  The
planner will prefer not to use an index if it thinks that will
be slower, and in this case it sounds like that could be right.
(Don't ever assume that what the planner does with a small table
is what it will do with a large table.)

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Seq scan vs index scan
Следующее
От: arun chirappurath
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Seq scan vs index scan