Re: Any better plan for this query?..
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1242739192.14551.204.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. (Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 13:01 +0100, Matthew Wakeling wrote: > That leads me on to another topic. Consider the query: > > SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY a, b > > where the column "a" is declared UNIQUE and has an index. Does Postgres > eliminate "b" from the ORDER BY, and therefore allow fetching without > sorting from the index? No, because we don't use unique constraints much at all to infer things. > Or how about this query: > > SELECT * FROM table1, table2 WHERE table1.fk = table2.id ORDER BY > table1.id, table2.id > > where both "id" columns are UNIQUE with an index. Do we eliminate > "table2.id" from the ORDER BY in this case? Yes, that is eliminated via equivalence classes. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: