Re: Any better plan for this query?..
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1242659279.14551.7.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. (Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Any better plan for this query?..
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 20:25 +0200, Dimitri wrote: > # lwlock_wait_8.4.d `pgrep -n postgres` > Lock Id Mode Combined Time (ns) > FirstLockMgrLock Exclusive 803700 > BufFreelistLock Exclusive 3001600 > FirstLockMgrLock Shared 4586600 > FirstBufMappingLock Exclusive 6283900 > FirstBufMappingLock Shared 21792900 I've published two patches to -Hackers to see if we can improve the read only numbers on 32+ cores. Try shared_buffer_partitions = 256 -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: