Re: Any better plan for this query?..
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1242068608.3843.161.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> writes: > > Anyone may explain me why analyze target may have so huge negative > > secondary effect?.. > > If these are simple queries, maybe what you're looking at is the > increase in planning time caused by having to process 10x as much > statistical data. Cranking statistics_target to the max just because > you can is not necessarily a good strategy. statistics_target effects tables, so we have problems if you have a mix of simple and complex queries. IMHO we need an explicit planner_effort control, rather than the more arcane *_limit knobs which are effectively the same thing, just harder to use in practice. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: