Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> On 12 Apr 2023, at 22:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Plausible alternatives include:
>> 2. Run a second BF animal that's intentionally pointed at the MacPorts
>> environment, in hopes of testing what MacPorts users would see.
>>
>> #2 feels like it might not be a waste of cycles, and certainly that
>> machine is underworked at the moment. Thoughts?
> I think #2 would be a good addition. Most won't build OpenSSL themselves so
> seeing builds from envs that are reasonable to expect in the wild is more
> interesting.
I have an animal cranked up and awaiting approval; however, it fails
the src/test/ldap tests in v11, apparently because aa1419e63 was not
back-patched. Barring objections, I'll back-patch that before
bringing the animal on-line (or Thomas can do it, if he wishes).
regards, tom lane