Re: XML ouput for psql
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12389.1047943129@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: XML ouput for psql (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: XML ouput for psql
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not really; what of applications other than shell scripts that would
>> like to get XML-formatted output?
> Well, programs can run psql using popen. It seems overkill to get the
> protocol involved, specially since it is output-only. I can't imagine
> who would bother with the wire protocol messiness just to get xml.
Having to popen a psql isn't overkill? This seems like a far messier
solution than the other. Furthermore, it's just plain not an available
solution in many scenarios (think of a Java program running JDBC; it may
not have privileges to do popen, and may not have access to a copy of
psql anyway).
If we were not already opening up the protocol for changes, I'd be
resistant to the idea too. But since we are, I think it should be fixed
where it's cleanest to fix it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: