Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1238839426.5444.265.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > So on third thought I think the patch logic is sound; but I think that > as documentation we had better add another bool parameter to > GetCurrentVirtualXIDs indicating whether it's okay to ignore procs > with xmin = 0. That sounds better through being more explicit. I didn't consider whether the patched function was true in all cases, only that it looked correct in the current usage. Another lesson in future-proofing code. Thanks also for the clear proof. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: