Re: plpgsql arrays
От
Simon Riggs
Тема
Re: plpgsql arrays
Дата
Msg-id
1238779839.5444.220.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Ответ на
Re: plpgsql arrays (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: plpgsql arrays Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 10:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Matthew Wakeling writes: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Robert Haas wrote: > >> Why not just use SQL to do the join? > > > Because the merge condition is: > > > WHERE l1.start <= l2.end AND l2.start <= l1.end > > > and merge joins in postgres only currently cope with the case where the > > merge condition is an equals relationship. (snip) > I don't actually believe that a standard merge join algorithm will work > with an intransitive join condition ... I think it's a common enough problem that having a non-standard join algorithm written for that case would be interesting indeed. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления