Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1238164596.16568.604.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 10:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> If we go with this, I would suggest we make *neither* the default by > >> removing -t, and adopting two new options: something like -f == fast > >> failover, -p == patient failover. > > > -m smart|fast|immediate :-) > > +1 for using a "-m something" type of syntax instead of having to try to > pick single-letter switches that are mnemonic for the different cases. > But -1 to those particular mode names --- I think it will invite > confusion with pg_ctl's behavior. The choice is between * one parameter with the option being given as text within trigger file * two parameters naming different types of trigger file I don't mind which, as long as it is one of those two, unless there is a third way to specify things so that user has control at failover time. A single -m option would hardcode that decision ahead of time, which is undesirable behaviour, hence the additional complexity being discussed. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: