Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1236807900.28644.211.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should SET ROLE inherit config params? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 14:27 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > I was just noticing that doing SET ROLE changes the current session's > priviledges, but not any runtime configuration parameters (like work_mem > or statement_timeout) associated with the new role. > > This is as documented (although I want to add a line to SET ROLE docs) > but is it the behavior we want? I for one would like SET ROLE to change > runtime configs. Sounds good to me, but you may want to explore what problems that might cause so we can avoid screwing up. Perhaps it could be an option? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: