Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1236673269.31880.341.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:02 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > >> > >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > >>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both? > >>>> > >> > >> > >>> That's already used: > >> > >>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches > >>> pg_dump version > >> > >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely. > >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts". > > > > +1. I was just thinking the same thing. > > +1, that sounds like a very good idea. +1 good plan -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: