On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:14 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > *Shrug* long term consistency is the better choice.
>
> Easy to say if you're not one of the people for whom such a change
> would mean weeks of recoding, the need to start QA'ing everything from
> scratch again and a hideous mess of code to cope with after adding
> support for a new version with a different catalog schema.
>
It is not easy to say. It is correct to say. I am under no illusion that
this will not be painful. As far as "man weeks of recoding". Sorry, I
know that will be tough.
> Besides - what percentage of users ever go anywhere near the
> catalogs? I'd guess a fraction of a percent of users, and maybe 1 - 5%
> of developers.
>
Any DBA worth his salt uses system catalogs. Lowering the barrier on
uses these catalogs will lead to better and more useful tools as well.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997