Re: Hot standby, recovery procs
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery procs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1235640002.16176.435.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery procs (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby, recovery procs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:04 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > we keep track of which xids > have already been "reported" in the WAL (similar to what you had in an > earlier version of the patch) You objected to doing exactly that earlier. Why is it OK to do it now that you are proposing it? You haven't even given a good reason to make these changes. We don't have time to make this change and then shake out everything else that will break as a result. Are you suggesting that you will make these changes and then follow up on all other breakages? Forcing this request seems like a great way to cancel this patch, since it will be marked as "author refused to make change". You have spotted a problem elsewhere and I am working to fix that now. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: