Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables

On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It'd make more sense to put the effort into developing
> > >> better scheduling control over autovacuum, such as a concept of
> > >> maintenance windows.
> > 
> > > We need that as well, not instead of.
> > 
> > I disagree; adding every frammish anyone could ever think of is not
> > an overall improvement to the system.
> 
> Agreed, let's get this capability out in 8.4 and we can always adust it
> based on user demand.

Oh, I agree to limiting what we do for 8,4, but we need more later.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support