Re: location of Unix socket
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: location of Unix socket |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12335.975359068@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: location of Unix socket (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: location of Unix socket
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Am I handling this properly? I hate to be dragging around the unix
> socket directory name in pghost for too long and hate to be propogating
> the slash test throughout the code.
It's probably cleanest to do that the way you are doing it. However,
one could argue we should make PQhost() returnpghost ? pghost : pgunixsocket
which'd make the external behavior compatible with the way one specifies
the connection.
Basically, the idea was to *not* have a distinct unixsocket spec
anywhere in libpq's external API, so that existing apps wouldn't need
a rewrite to support this feature. Keeping unixsocket separate inside
the library is a good idea, but it's independent of the API.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: