Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h

Alvaro Herrera <alvaro.herrera@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2021-Jun-18, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I guess one unresolved question is whether we want to mention these in
>> the SGML docs.  I vote "no", because it'll raise the maintenance cost
>> noticeably.  But I can see an argument on the other side.

> Well, if we do want docs for these macros, then IMO it'd be okay to have
> them in libpq-fe.h itself rather than SGML.  A one-line comment for each
> would suffice:

WFM.  I'd sort of supposed that the symbol names were self-documenting,
but you're right that a line or so of annotation improves things.

            regards, tom lane