Re: Materializing a sequential scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Materializing a sequential scan
Дата
Msg-id 12333.1130367975@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Materializing a sequential scan  ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>)
Ответы Re: Materializing a sequential scan  ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> writes:
> Any good ideas why 8.1 would refuse to do this, when 7.4 would do it? It does
> not matter how high I set my work_mem; even at 2.000.000 it refused to hash
> the subplan.

AFAICS, subplan_is_hashable() is testing the same conditions in 7.4 and
HEAD, so this isn't clear.  Want to step through it and see where it's
deciding not to hash?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Thomas F. O'Connell"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuning seqscan costs
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance issues with custom functions