Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1233213658.2327.2598.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:36 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I feel quite good about this patch now. Given the amount of code churn, it > >> requires testing, and I'll read it through one more time after sleeping over > >> it. Simon, do you see anything wrong with this? > > > > I also read this patch and found something odd. I apologize if I misread it.. > > If archive recovery fails after it reaches the last valid record > in the last unfilled WAL segment, subsequent recovery might cause > the following fatal error. This is because minSafeStartPoint indicates > the end of the last unfilled WAL segment which subsequent recovery > cannot reach. Is this bug? (I'm not sure how to fix this problem > because I don't understand yet why minSafeStartPoint is required.) > > > FATAL: WAL ends before end time of backup dump I think you're right. We need a couple of changes to avoid confusing messages. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: