Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1233173601.2327.2531.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 21:41 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > So, you can think of the unobserved xids array as an extension of > ProcArray. The entries are like light-weight PGPROC entries. In fact I > proposed earlier to simply create dummy PGPROC entries instead. Which we don't do because we don't know whether we are dealing with top-level xids or subtransactions of already observed top-level xids. Either way we have to rearrange things when we move from unobserved to observed. A major difference is that what we have now works and what we might have instead may not, which is being illustrated by recent testing. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: