Re: pg_upgrade project status
| От | Zdenek Kotala |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1233082625.1475.17.camel@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade project status (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade project status
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander píše v út 27. 01. 2009 v 15:54 +0100:
>
> I have a hard time thinking that we'll have wasted a lot of time on
> first doing a perl implementation if we have to rewrite it in C later.
> The other way around would be a waste though. The amount of time spent
> on the perl implementation I expect to be a *lot* less than the
> combination of thinking up the *way* to do it in general and the C
> implementation time.
Agree with Magnus. I'm happy with korn shell for now :-). And we need
better solution anyway for future releases. Current approach does not
support e.g. dropped column.
Zdenek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: