Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1232631928.2327.862.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 14:52 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > as I understand, there are already plans to utilize this feature. If so, > > we need to be more attentive by now. > > Is there? If I understood Simon correctly in the last paragraphs of > these emails: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1221470800.3913.1229.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1221555881.3913.1761.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant > > he has no immediate use for this. Immediate use cases for me would be * ability to filter WAL records based on database or relation * ability to recover quickly from various types of bug, for example if new freespace code caused a corruption we would be able to sidestep it and get the database up again quickly without doing resetxlog and losing data. Medium term * bit map indexes But this isn't just for me... -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: