Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1232582880.2327.696.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:06 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Plugability adds complexity. Heikki's comment is that adding this > patch make the job of creating pluggable indexes 5% easier, while no > one is actually working on plugable indexes, and it hard to say that > making it 5% easier really advances anything, especially since many of > our existing index types aren't WAL-logged. Plugability is not a > zero-cost feature. Sorry Bruce, but that misses the key point. Without the patch it is completely *impossible* to write an index plugin that is *recoverable*. Yes, we have pluggable indexes now, but unless they are recoverable we certainly can't ever use them in production. With the patch, you still have to write the index code. I agree it is hard code to write, but not impossible. I would go so far as to say that the patch helps you 0% with the task of actually writing the plugin. But the patch enables you to start and that is all its intended as: an enabler. So its not a "slightly easier" thing, its a can/cannot thing. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: