Re: rmgr hooks (v2)
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rmgr hooks (v2) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1232552040.2327.496.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rmgr hooks (v2) (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: rmgr hooks (v2)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 14:28 +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > The only advantage that remains, I think, is the real-world concern > that you can have proprietary plugins How exactly is this plugin more likely to result in a proprietary plugin than all of the other plugin types we have? Because I suggest it?? I find it quite amazing that anybody would think I proposed a patch whose "only advantage" lay in commercial exploitation, implying that I intend that. But at least you had the courage to write it, allowing me to answer, so actually I'll say thank you for raising that point: ** I have no plans for selling software that has been enabled by this patch. ** The plugin approach was suggested because it brings together so many use cases in one and adds missing robustness to a case where we already have extensibility. Extensibility is about doing things for specific implementations *without* needing to patch Postgres, not just allowing external projects to exist alongside. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: