Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()
Дата
Msg-id 1232128020.31669.71.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > No need to wait for idle-in-transaction sessions during index builds.
> > GetCurrentVirtualXIDs() specifically *includes* backends that have
> > proc->xmin == InvalidTransactionId (0), but I'm not sure why.
> 
> Because they might be about to change xmin to something real?

True, they might.

GetSnapshotData() involuntarily sets xmin in their proc, so they would
have to be doing some strange footwork: they would have to have started
GetSnapshotData() *before* the index build and not finished it until
*after* we check GetCurrentVirtualXIDs() (after the index build).

If you think that is a serious possibility, then grabbing ProcArrayLock
in exclusive mode should close that gap.

I can't see a reason for idle-in-transaction sessions to block index
builds.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding new windowing functions in 8.4devel