Re: A better BETWEEN for DATEs, TIMEs and TIMESTAMPs?
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A better BETWEEN for DATEs, TIMEs and TIMESTAMPs? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1231969087.32625.123.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: A better BETWEEN for DATEs, TIMEs and TIMESTAMPs? (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A better BETWEEN for DATEs, TIMEs and TIMESTAMPs?
Re: A better BETWEEN for DATEs, TIMEs and TIMESTAMPs? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:35 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > I think the best solution is to make first-class interval types (for > time as well as other types). Those intervals can then have operators > like "contains" and "contained by" which would solve your problem. > > Additionally, it would allow lots of other interesting operations, like > overlaps and intersects. I wrote such an interval type here, called "period" (to avoid confusion with the SQL INTERVAL type): http://pgfoundry.org/projects/temporal Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: