Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1230039701.4793.828.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 18:36 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > Personally, I would like to have a > simple setup where I can initially setup primary and standby and they > continue to work in a single-failure mode without any additional > administrative overhead (such as rsync). But that's just me and I > don't know what the preferred option in the field. If you want a tripod, you need to turn up with all 3 legs. :-) PostgreSQL is a working product, not a framework or a function library. We're not going to add code that has no function at all other than as part of a larger feature, unless we add the whole feature. I'm happy if that whole feature is added. If we do add it, it will be a utility like "pg_resync". So in admin terms it will be almost identical to using rsync, just a specific version that minimizes effort even more than rsync does currently. The only difference as I see it would be some gain in performance, but we don't need to send the whole database down the wire again in either case. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: