Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1229687463.4793.515.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:59 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > * corner case behaviour of backendids - bgwriter writes checkpoint WAL > > records. Has no backendid, but needs a slotid (possibly others) > > Why does bgwriter need a slotid? It doesn't run any transactions. > > > * slotids are assigned once and never changed, so allowing them to be > > used as array lookups directly > > So are backend ids. I'm a little hazy, to be sure. I'm pretty sure there was a blocker, but if I cannot recall it we should assume it doesn't exist. Where are you going with the thought? Remove slotId from each proc and then use backendId to identify the recovery proc? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: