Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1229626454.4793.444.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reducing some DDL Locks to ShareLock (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > heap_inplace_fetch takes as input "tuple" which is a palloc'd tuple, > > extracts from it the tid of the tuple, reads the buffer, locks it, then > > releases the original tuple. It then returns a copy of the on-block > > tuple. So all other code the same as before when we were working on a > > copy produced from the syscache. > > > Is that roughly what you intended? > > I'd suggest making it take a TID rather than presuming where the caller > is going to get the TID from. Otherwise, +1. Just to mention I haven't forgotten about this. I wrote a patch on 20/11 and was debugging it when I fell ill. I've updated the patch now to CVS HEAD and will retest it in next few days. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: