Re: benchmarking the query planner
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: benchmarking the query planner |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1229106717.8673.88.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: benchmarking the query planner (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: benchmarking the query planner
Re: benchmarking the query planner |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I seem to recall Greg suggesting that there were ways to estimate > ndistinct without sorting, but short of a fundamental algorithm change > there's not going to be a win here. Hash table? Haas Stokes suggests a Bloom filter. Why not keep the random algorithm we have now, but scan the block into a separate hash table for ndistinct estimation. That way we keep the correct random rows for other purposes. > > Right now we may as well use a random number generator. > > Could we skip the hyperbole please? Some of the ndistinct values are very badly off, and in the common cases I cited previously, consistently so. Once I'm certain the rescue helicopter has seen me, I'll stop waving my arms. (But yes, OK). -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: