Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1229031560.13078.170.camel@hp_dx2400_1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 19:19 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > My new design of archiving is as follows. So far I haven't asked about running multiple standby servers and don't recall having seen this mentioned anywhere. Forgive me if this was already mentioned. The idea is that we would be able to have multiple standby servers connecting to one primary, yes? It would be useful to have sync replication work that it must get an acknowledgement from at least one standby before it continues. Or do you think we would stream to just one standby, then use the archiver (primary or standby) to keep sending files to allow multiple additional standby nodes? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: