On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 23:17 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Though it is a somewhat separate problem from current patch I'd like to
> > do something about it before having it all committed, as the fix must
> > touch the very same places than this patch.
> >
> > I think it takes two-tree days to figure out proper way to fix it.
> >
> > I'd like it to just accept ANY* and do the right thing but I may end up
> > just rejecting ANY* on both IN and OUT args.
>
> The text above makes it sound like you're still working on this, but
> that was more than three weeks ago. What is the status of this now?
It is ready to be applied without support for ANY*, just with the patch
for uninitialized pointer vector (uses pymalloc0 instead of pymalloc )
tom mentioned.
I am working on getting any supported as well though I was tied up with
other things wor last 1.5 weeks
--
------------------------------------------
Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability Services, Consulting and Training