Re: Review: Hot standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: Hot standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1227640387.14213.12.camel@hp_dx2400_1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: Hot standby ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: Hot standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 19:02 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Huh? The "read only" transaction mode is not hard read-only > anyway, > so if that's the only step being taken, it's entirely useless. > > > I think there are explicit checks for some utility statements (like > VACUUM), but I haven't checked if all necessary code paths are covered > or not. The commands that need protecting have been explicitly identified in the notes and there are 7 files changed that were specifically identified with protective changes. You've identified a way of breaking part the first line of defence, but the command was caught by the second line of defence in the patch. Problem, yes. Major issue, no. Will fix. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: