Re: Distinct types
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Distinct types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1226079558.30638.15.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Distinct types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Distinct types
Re: Distinct types Re: Distinct types |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 16:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > On Friday 31 October 2008 17:01:05 Kevin Grittner wrote: > >> (1) Can you compare a literal of the base type? > > > No, unless you create additional casts or operators. > > >> (2) Can you explicitly cast to the base type? > > > There is an implicit AS ASSIGNMENT cast between the base type and the distinct > > type in each direction. > > Hmm ... so out-of-the-box, a distinct type would have no applicable > functions/operators whatsoever. You couldn't even create an index on > it. This seems a bit too impoverished to be useful. And given the I didn't have any problem creating and using an index on a distinct type at all. Regards,Jeff Davis postgres=# create type mytype as int; CREATE DOMAIN postgres=# create table mytable (foo mytype); CREATE TABLE postgres=# insert into mytable values (1),(2); INSERT 0 2 postgres=# create index myindex on mytable(foo); CREATE INDEX postgres=# set enable_seqscan = f; SET postgres=# explain select * from mytable order by foo desc; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Index Scan Backward using myindex on mytable (cost=0.00..12.28 rows=2 width=4) (1 row) postgres=# select * from mytable order by foo desc;foo ----- 2 1 (2 rows)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: