Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4.
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1225231015.3971.268.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4. (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:40 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Gregory Stark wrote: > > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > > > > I'm happy with the idea of a readahead process. I thought we were > > > implementing a BackgroundReader process for other uses. Is that dead > > > now? > > > > You and Bruce seem to keep resurrecting that idea. I've never liked it -- I > > always hated that in Oracle and thought it was a terrible kludge. > > I didn't think I was promoting the separate reader process after you had > the posix_fadvise() idea. I think Greg is misinterpreting our occasional lack of exactness as disagreement. The end solution is the goal, not any of the discussed mechanisms. It's always good to have a name for it that sums up the goals rather than the methods e.g. frequent update optimisation rather than update-in-place. It would be good if the solutions for normal running and recovery were similar. Greg, please could you look into that? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: