Re: minimal update
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: minimal update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1224703266.27145.441.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: minimal update (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: minimal update
Re: minimal update |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 14:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > There seems to be a preponderance of opinion for doing this as a > builtin. Here is a patch that does it that way, along with docs and > regression test. In your example you use an underscore as the first character. The way you have done this it will probably exclude any other before row triggers from firing, which may have altered the value of one or more columns. The more probable choice for me would be to have a trigger that came after all other before triggers, and so should have a different name. It's just an example, so your choice is fine, but I think you should bring out that point more clearly for the average developer. Can we call the function "minimal_update_trigger", rather than min_... -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: