Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby.
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1224698932.27145.398.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 13:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > #5 0x171680 in TransactionIdSetStatusBit (xid=2063810256, > status=2063810248, > lsn={xlogid = 0, xrecoff = 0}, slotno=0) at clog.c:330 > #6 0x1714e8 in TransactionIdSetPageStatus (xid=84, nsubxids=1, > subxids=0x4008dd78, status=2063840993, lsn={xlogid = 0, xrecoff = > 0}, > pageno=0) at clog.c:290 > #7 0x1712dc in TransactionIdSetTreeStatus (xid=19394, nsubxids=1, > subxids=0x4008dd78, status=1, lsn={xlogid = 0, xrecoff = 0}) at > clog.c:204 > #8 0x1722f8 in TransactionIdCommitTree (xid=2063670312, > nxids=2063839972, > xids=0x7b011cf0) at transam.c:266 > #9 0x1785b8 in xact_redo_commit (xlrec=0x4008dd48, xid=19394) at > xact.c:4222 These traces look weird. Look at the way the xid changes value as we move from call to call. It looks like something is screwy there. If those values are correct we should have failed an earlier assertion. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: