Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1224670736.8473.3.camel@huvostro обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 18:52 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > Also, I can't help thinking that this would be a lot simpler if we just > treated all subtransactions the same as top-level transactions. The only > problem with that is that there can be a lot of subtransactions, which > means that we'd need a large UnobservedXids array to handle the worst > case, but maybe it would still be acceptable? I remember cases on this list where long transactions did run out of subtransaction ids. To accommodate something approacing that we need an array for storing (max_connections * 4G ) UnobservedXids instead of just max_connections. ----------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: