Re: query optimization
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: query optimization |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12228.1335467838@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | query optimization (Richard Kojedzinszky <krichy@tvnetwork.hu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: query optimization
Re: query optimization |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Richard Kojedzinszky <krichy@tvnetwork.hu> writes:
> Dear list,
> We have a database schema, which looks the same as the attached script.
> When filling the tables with data, and skipping analyze on the table (so
> pg_stats contains no records for table 'a'), the first select in the
> script runs fast, but after an analyze the planner decides to sequence
> scan tables b and c, thus making the query much slower. Can somebody help
> me solving this issue, or tuning our installation to not to use sequence
> scans in this case?
Um ... did you analyze all the tables, or just some of them? I get
sub-millisecond runtimes if all four tables have been analyzed, but it
does seem to pick lousy plans if, say, only a and b have been analyzed.
What you really need for this query structure is the parameterized-path
work I've been doing for 9.2; but at least on the exact example given,
I'm not seeing that 9.1 is that much worse.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: