Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Initial prefetch performance testing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1222269339.4445.597.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Initial prefetch performance testing (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 17:42 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Yeah. Nevertheless I like the way effective_spindle_count works, as > opposed to an unintuitive "number of blocks to prefetch" (assuming the > formula we use to turn the former into latter works). Perhaps we should > keep the meaning the same, but call it "effective_io_concurrency"? > Something that conveys the idea of "how many simultaneous I/O requests > the I/O subsystem can handle", without referring to any specific > technology. That concept applies to SANs and RAM drives as well. You've spoiled all the fun now with a good suggestion. I was looking forward to the Jules Verne-like nostalgia of the other suggestion over the years to come. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: