Re: [GENERAL] id and ID in CREATE TABLE

stefan@extum.com writes:
> But anyway this is not so important, but why upper cases are bad ?

It's well established that all-lower-case text is more readable than
all-upper-case ... at least in English; but I think the same would be
true of any language using an approximately Roman alphabet.  The problem
with upper case is there's less variation in the overall letter shape.
If you don't care to dig in the academic literature about it, here's a
simple experiment: which of the following paragraphs do you find more
readable?

	it's well established that all-lower-case text is more readable
	than all-upper-case ... at least in english; but i think the
	same would be true of any language using an approximately roman
	alphabet.  the problem with upper case is there's less variation
	in the overall letter shape.  if you don't care to dig in the
	academic literature about it, here's a simple experiment: which
	of the following paragraphs do you find more readable?

	IT'S WELL ESTABLISHED THAT ALL-LOWER-CASE TEXT IS MORE READABLE
	THAN ALL-UPPER-CASE ... AT LEAST IN ENGLISH; BUT I THINK THE
	SAME WOULD BE TRUE OF ANY LANGUAGE USING AN APPROXIMATELY ROMAN
	ALPHABET.  THE PROBLEM WITH UPPER CASE IS THERE'S LESS VARIATION
	IN THE OVERALL LETTER SHAPE. IF YOU DON'T CARE TO DIG IN THE
	ACADEMIC LITERATURE ABOUT IT, HERE'S A SIMPLE EXPERIMENT: WHICH
	OF THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS DO YOU FIND MORE READABLE?

For me, at least, the second version takes noticeably more time to read
and is certainly less pleasant.  (I suppose that for a non-native
speaker of English, mental translation might slow you down to the point
where you don't notice a difference.  If so, try it on a random
paragraph in your own language.)

For PostgreSQL there is also a backwards compatibility issue: if we
change this decision now, we'd cause all kinds of problems for existing
code and databases.

> Why then Oracle , IBM is using them and why the SQL standard is not 
> changed ?

The SQL standard's choice in this matter is prehistoric; undoubtedly
it falls out of the days when computer printers only had one type case.
IBM probably still has a residual fondness for those days ;-).  But
the rest of the industry figured out that lower case was better
somewhere around 1960, cf Algol-60 which was the first language to spell
its keywords preferentially in lower case.

			regards, tom lane