Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1221127463.3913.852.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:24 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > Taking snapshots from primary has a few disadvantages > > > > ... > > * snapshots on primary prevent row removal (but this was also an > > advantage of this technique!) > > That makes it an awful solution for high availability. Please be careful about making such statements. People might think you were opposing the whole idea of Hot Standby, rather than giving an opinion about one suggestion out of many implementation proposals. Looks like you've got some good additional suggestions later in the post. I'll reply later to those, so thanks for that. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: