Re: Need more reviewers!
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need more reviewers! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1220621978.4371.1172.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need more reviewers! (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need more reviewers!
Re: Need more reviewers! |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 10:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > > > >> If you are a postgresql hacker at all, or even want to be one, we need your > >> help reviewing patches! There are several "easy" patches in the list, so > >> I can assign them to beginners. > >> > > > > It would be a reasonable rule that all patch submitters also have to do > > patch reviews. If we made it a strict rule, then sponsoring companies > > would know that they *must* provide money/time for that aspect also. > > Otherwise it is almost impossible to get formal approval to do that. > All this would do is to deter people from submitting patches. Hard rules > like this don't work in FOSS communities. I know it's like herding cats, > but persuasion is really our only tool. I don't *want* the rule, I just think we *need* the rule because otherwise sponsors/managers/etc make business decisions to exclude that aspect of the software dev process. Otherwise we have a patch-and-dump culture that is unsustainable because a few people's benevolence as reviewers turns everything into a bottleneck. It doesn't need to mean loss of control for core and committers. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: