Re: StartupCLOG
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: StartupCLOG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1220543935.4371.981.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: StartupCLOG (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: StartupCLOG
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > > I notice that StartupCLOG zeroes out entries later than the nextxid when > > we complete recovery in StartupXLOG, reason given is safety in case we > > crash. > > > ISTM that we should also do that whenever we see a Shutdown Checkpoint > > in WAL, since that can be caused by a shutdown immediate, shutdown abort > > or crash. > > Er, what? The definition of a crash is the *lack* of a shutdown > checkpoint. Yes, but that's not what I'm saying. I was thinking about what happens when you are performing a PITR using log records that contain a crash/recovery/shutdown checkpoint sequence. I take it there's no problem there? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: